|
Afghanistan
|

|
Rule of the rapists
Britain and the US said war on Afghanistan would
liberate women. We are still waiting
Mariam Rawi in Kabul
Thursday February 12, 2004
The Guardian
When the US began bombing Afghanistan on October 7
2001, the oppression of Afghan women was used as a justification for overthrowing the
Taliban regime. Five weeks later America's first lady, Laura Bush, stated triumphantly: "Because
of our recent military gains in much of Afghanistan, women are no longer imprisoned in their
homes. The fight against terrorism is also a fight for the rights and dignity of women."
However, Amnesty International paints a rather
different picture: "Two years after the ending of the Taliban regime, the international community and
the Afghan transitional administration, led by President Hamid Karzai, have proved unable to protect
women. The risk of rape and sexual violence by members of armed factions and former
combatants is still high. Forced marriage, particularly of girl children, and violence against
women in the family are widespread in many areas of the country."
In truth, the situation of women in Afghanistan
remains appalling. Though girls and women inKabul, and some other cities, are free to go to school
and have jobs, this is not the case in most parts of the country. In the western province of Herat,
the warlord Ismail Khan imposes Talibanlike decrees.
Many women have no access to education and
are banned from working in foreign NGOs or UN offices, and there are hardly any women in
government offices. Women cannot take a taxi or walk unless accompanied by a close male
relative. If seen with men who are not close relatives, women can be arrested by the "special
police" and forced to undergo a hospital examination to see if they have recently had sexual
intercourse. Because of this continued oppression, every month a large number of girls commit
suicide - many more than under the Taliban.
Women's rights fare no better in northern and southern
Afghanistan, which are under the control of the Northern Alliance. One international NGO worker
told Amnesty International: "During the Taliban era, if a woman went to market and showed an
inch of flesh she would have been flogged; now she's raped."
Even in Kabul, where thousands of foreign troops are
present, Afghan women do not feel safe, and many continue to wear the burka for protection. In
some areas where girls' education does exist, parents are afraid to allow their daughters to
take advantage of it following the burning down of several girls' schools. Girls have been
abducted on the way to school and sexual assaults on children of both sexes are now commonplace,
according to Human Rights Watch.
In spite of its rhetoric, the Karzai government
actively pursues policies that are anti-women. Women cannot find jobs, and girls' schools often lack
the most basic materials, such as books and chairs. There is no legal protection for women,
and the older legal systems prohibit them from getting help when they need it. Female singers
are not allowed on Kabul television, and women's songs are not played, while scenes in films of
women not wearing the hijab are censored.
The Karzai government has established a women's
ministry just to throw dust in the eyes of the international community. In reality, this ministry has
done nothing for women. There are complaints that money given to the women's ministry by
foreign NGOs has been taken by powerful warlords in the Karzai cabinet.
The "war on terror" toppled the Taliban
regime, but it has not removed religious fundamentalism, which is the main cause of misery for Afghan women. In
fact, by bringing the warlords back to power, the US has replaced one misogynist
fundamentalist regime with another.
But then the US never did fight the Taliban to save
Afghan women. As recently as 2000 the Bush administration gave the Taliban $43m as a reward for
reducing the opium harvest. Now the US supports the Northern Alliance, which was responsible
for killing more than 50,000 civilians during its bloody rule in the 1990s. Those in power today -
men such as Karim Khalili, Rabbani, Sayyaf, Fahim, Yunus Qanooni, Mohaqiq and Abdullah - were
those who imposed anti-women restrictions as soon as they took control in 1992 and
started a reign of terror throughout Afghanistan. Thousands of women and girls were
systematically raped by armed thugs, and many committed suicide to avoid being sexually
assaulted by them.
But lack of women's rights is not the only problem
facing Afghanistan today. Neither opium cultivation nor warlordism and terrorism have been
uprooted. There is no peace, stability or security. President Karzai is a prisoner within his
own government, the nominal head of a regime in which former Northern Alliance commanders hold the
real power. In such a climate, the results of the forthcoming elections in June can easily be
predicted: the Northern Alliance will once againhijack the results to give legitimacy to its
bloody rule.
In November 2001 Colin Powell, the US secretary of
state, said: "The rights of women in Afghanistan will not be negotiable." But the
women of Afghanistan have felt with their whole bodies the dishonesty of such statements from US and
British leaders - we know that they have already negotiated away women's rights in Afghanistan
by imposing the most treacherous warlords on the people. Their pretty speeches are made
out of political expediency rather than genuine concern.
From 1992 to 2001 Afghan women were treated as cattle
by all brands of fundamentalists, from jihadis to the Taliban. Some western writers have
tried to suggest that this oppression has its roots in Afghan traditions and that it is
disrespectful of "cultural difference" to criticise it. Yet Afghan women themselves are not silent victims. There
is resistance, but you have to look for it, as any serious anti-fundamentalist group has to work
semi-underground. The Revolutionary Association of Women of Afghanistan (Rawa), which was
outlawed under the Taliban, still can't open an office in Kabul. We still can't distribute our
magazine Payam-e-Zan (Women's Message) openly. Shopkeepers are still threatened with death
for stocking our publications, and Rawa supporters have been tortured and imprisoned for
distributing them. People who are caught reading our literature are still in
danger. Feminism does not need to be imported; it has already
taken root in Afghanistan. Long before the US bombing, progressive organisations were trying to
establish freedom, democracy, secularism and women's rights. Then, western governments and
media showed little interest in the plight of Afghan women. When, before September 11 2001, Rawa
gave footage of the execution of its leader, Zarmeena, to the BBC, CNN, ABC and others, it
was told that the footage was too shocking to broadcast. However, after September 11
these same media organisations aired the footage repeatedly. Similarly, some of Rawa's
photographs documenting the Taliban's abuses of women were also used - without our permission. They
were reproduced as flyers and dropped by American warplanes as they flew over Afghanistan.
This piece first appeared in New Internationalist
magazine ( www.newint.org)
Mariam Rawi, a member of the Revolutionary Association
of Women of Afghanistan, is writing under a pseudonym
www.rawa.org
|